Subject: Re: [boost] What hash functions should be included in a hypothetical Boost hash-v2 library?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-31 15:21:22
On December 31, 2017 3:29:07 AM Peter Dimov via Boost
> What (non-cryptographic) hash functions should a hypothetical future Boost
> hash library contain? Have clear winners emerged by now? Which ones do
> people prefer?
> SipHash is basically a given, but it's not optimized for speed.
There are a number of widely used hash functions. I often use MurmurHash or
one-at-a-time for their speed and simplicity. CityHash is also known and
I've just discovered its successor, FarmHash.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk