Subject: Re: [boost] What hash functions should be included in a hypothetical Boost hash-v2 library?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-12-31 16:22:58
On December 31, 2017 7:06:08 PM Vinnie Falco via Boost
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I often use MurmurHash
> Murmur is vulnerable to algorithmic complexity attacks:
MurmurHash is not intended to be cryptographically secure. Where the hash
can be applied to external data you probably want a more secure function.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk