Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-23 09:26:01
> This could be handled by providing a dedicated heterogeneous comparison
> between `result<T, EC>` and `EC`. But my preference would be a dedicated
I'm still not sure if the current "loose comparison" functionality ought
to be in Outcome at all. But if it were, it would almost certainly be
free functions in the `utils` namespace in my opinion e.g.
`utils::loose_compare(a, b)` or something like that.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk