Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-23 09:33:33
> So, maybe provide two implementations of swap: one for `EC` with no-throw
> swap, and the other for `EC` with throwing swap.
That goes without saying. If `EC` is nothrow move and swap, there will
be an optimised implementation in the post-review fixes.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk