Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-23 09:33:33

Next message: Niall Douglas: "[boost] [outcome] Whether to default EC = error_code for result?"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops"
In reply to: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops"
Next in thread: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira: "Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops"

> So, maybe provide two implementations of swap: one for `EC` with no-throw
> swap, and the other for `EC` with throwing swap.

That goes without saying. If `EC` is nothrow move and swap, there will
be an optimised implementation in the post-review fixes.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/

Next message: Niall Douglas: "[boost] [outcome] Whether to default EC = error_code for result?"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops"
In reply to: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops"
Next in thread: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira: "Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk