Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-23 22:22:16
>> The particular theme I chose requires a real web server, it doesn't work
>> from a file:// address. Hence no point in bundling documentation that
>> you can read locally in the tarball.
> Frankly, I find this completely ridiculous.
> It's also goes against Boost's documentation
> "The format for documentation should be HTML, and
> should not require an advanced browser or
> server-side extensions"
1. No server side extensions are needed. It's a static website.
2. Standard HTML5 is generated throughout. It (very slightly) fails
validation currently due to using <center>, but I'll be upgrading to the
latest release of the theme after the review which should fix that.
It ticks all the mandatory boxes in the requirements you link to.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk