Subject: Re: [boost] [atomic] (op)_and_test naming
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-26 00:08:47
> if (a.sub_and_test(1))
> Also, the generated code for these operations can potentially be more
While we're on the subject, on what architectures would opaque_sub be more
efficient than sub_and_test?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk