Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Andrzej's review
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-26 19:09:19
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost
> The only way to test it is to give this library the Boost blessing and have
> the user test it. I am bought by the TRY operations, and the upgrade to
> `outcome` looks really convincing.
Acceptance into Boost should not be used to "give users a library to
test." Motivated users are more than capable of using libraries that
are not already in Boost (for example, Beast already had a nicely
sized following before being accepted). This sounds a lot like the bad
practice of rushing libraries into the standard. Or another variation
of "we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it."
A library that is good will find users adopting it regardless of
whether the name "Boost" appears in front of it or not.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk