|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [review] outcome broken on clang/libstdc++ (Linux) and Apple clang/libc++ and gcc 7.2
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-28 00:07:49
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 7:01 PM, degski via Boost wrote:
> Any ICE is a compiler issue... so this is the wrong place to report the
> (ICE-)issue...
Sure. The author putting a library forward for review should feel free
to report any compiler defects to vendors that his library exposes. It
looks like Niall has done that already.
Or are you suggesting that reviewers trying to review the submission
during the review (by, among other things, running tests) shouldn't
mention to the author that they encountered an ICE?
Glen
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk