Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
From: VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira (vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-01 01:06:02
2018-01-31 21:02 GMT-03:00 Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> It's not the exceptions that made variant difficult. It's *the possibility
> of a failure* at certain points in some cases. You would have the same
> difficulty defining behavior in these cases with any error reporting
> mechanism, exceptions or not.
The way the language features interact makes this hard.
It'd be much simpler if move constructors were forbidden to throw (I'm
**not** saying this would be a good rule to have in the language).
Yet you can write buggy code like the one Andrzej Krzemienski mentioned not
-- VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira https://vinipsmaker.github.io/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk