Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
From: Fletcher, John P (j.p.fletcher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-04 23:31:23

I have been following these discussions with some bewilderment as much of it has happened since then end of the review period. I made my position clear earlier. I want to add that whatever the outcome I have learned a lot from experimenting with the code and getting to try it out alongside code in which I am interested. Best wishes to all. John ________________________________________ From: Boost [boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] on behalf of Robert Ramey via Boost [boost_at_[hidden]] Sent: 04 February 2018 22:58 To: Bjorn Reese via Boost Cc: Robert Ramey Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018) On 2/4/18 9:46 AM, Bjorn Reese via Boost wrote: > On 02/04/18 01:53, Niall Douglas via Boost wrote: > > If our community goals includes being an incubator for some C++ library > proposals, then we should not evaluate Boost candidate libraries > strictly on the merit of whether or not I personally can use this > library for my own projects. Personally, I would go further. I'm thinking that it can be part of Boost if some number reviewers find it to be useful, it embodies quality code and it follows boost rules, Robert Ramey > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: > > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at