Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 17:56:48
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Rob Stewart via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]
> I think the library could, at least, assert in debug builds when a result
> or outcome is not inspected.
That can be problematic. Suppose you have one that isn't inspected
(because the library you are calling uses outcome for return values) and an
exception is thrown (say, from a different library). Is it incorrect to
not have inspected it?
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> +1-847-691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk