Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 22:58:17
> No, no, no, f.e. boost::mp11, or boost::beast are to be compiled with
> C++11 and should therefor use std C++11 libraries instead of their
> equivalent boost version...
That's what they do; except Beast uses Boost.System because ASIO uses it,
and it uses Boost.Optional and boost::string_view because std::optional and
std::string_view are C++17, and so on. It's not like we go out of our way to
avoid using the available standard facilities.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk