Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-09 09:45:19
On 02/09/18 12:13, Olaf van der Spek via Boost wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:50 AM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost
> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> * is there any better option? All the other options I see are even worse.
> Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on these issues?
What do you propose to do with libraries that want to keep C++03
compatibility and rely on Boost.Test in tests?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk