Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-20 10:50:33


On 19 February 2018 at 20:57, mike via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I was not aware of this. Till now it seemed that boost library maintainer
> put great emphasis on not making any breaking changes without
> prior announcement. This is also reflected here:
> https://beta.boost.org/development/requirements.html#Backwards_compatibility
> (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/boost-developers-archive/DzExeMhmlX
> Y)

Perhaps I should make this clearer (which is tricky as the site is
static), but you shouldn't think of anything on the beta site as
approved. I think I said in the email that I put it up so that people
could read it easily and provide feedback.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk