Subject: Re: [boost] [CMake] Status of cmake support.
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-25 00:18:25
> But I've seen enough resistance (me st of it well reasoned) on the ml
> after the steering committee made their announcement that I wouldn't be
> surprised if a lot of reviews focus on deficiencies / differences compared
> to boost build that are inherent to cmake and not the library itself.
Not good form to foreshadow the reviews in such a manner. You're poisoning
everyone's mind so that every reviewer will be judged, if subconsciously,
against the idea that negative reviews imply bad faith.
We don't do that here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk