Re: [boost] [gsoc18] Request for Guidance

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc18] Request for Guidance
From: David Bellot (david.bellot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-03-11 17:55:44

Yes indeed, you can implement many more. You're free to add or remove
algorithms, as long as they can fit in a generic library like uBLAS.
SVM are quite specific when compared to a linear algebra library like
ublas. That's why I proposed to focus on generic methods first.
Cheers,
David

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:57 AM, mohammad sharique via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Hi Faisal,
> David and I are mentoring this project. You may start with the competency
> test, and when its
> done, you can send it directly to us. Once the test looks good, we'll help
> you with the proposal.
>
> Is there a specific reason that only the
> > listed algorithms have to be implemented. Because there are many good ML
> > algorithms that can also be implemented like SVM.
> >
> True, the list is long, and the mentioned algorithms are not the only ones
> we'd like to have. Infact,
> the more, the better. We can discuss more about it, after you are done with
> the competency test.
>
> Should you have any questions, please feel free to ask.
>
> Regards,
> Sharique
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>