Subject: Re: [boost] Build breaking changes
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-04-03 14:06:16
On 2 April 2018 at 20:30, Gavin Lambert via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> On 30/03/2018 07:48, Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Difficulty with one particular IDE does not count as a valid reason to
>> stick with 32-bit x86 to me.
> While the above is true, having the most popular compiler and IDE of the
> platform default to 32-bit does argue very strongly to *not stop* building
> 32-bit by default _on Windows_.
This might not stay this way! It also departs from the assumption that
*all* VS users are total numwitz, and do not attempt and succeed to set up
and select a 64-bit project.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk