Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] 1.68 master/beta MSVC compilation error with /fpermissive-
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-07-11 15:12:33
On 11 July 2018 at 17:56, Vinnie Falco via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> I couldn't disagree more (although, Boost should also be compiled with
> clang-cl if it is not discontinued).
You, I surmise, are alluding to the indeed dis-continued (it is),
ill-conceived idea of Clang/C2 (C2 is the VC backend)) as opposed to
Clang/LLVM. MS, words from the mouth of STL (the man), is testing their STL
(the library) with Clang/LLVM, Boost should do the same. MS is, from what I
gather also a (one of the) contributors to Clang.
> The latest Visual Studio is not
> vaporware it is a released, shipping product which many people use to
> accomplish real work.
Yes, it was, but even today I upgraded to 15.7.5, to which I only upgraded
2 weeks ago or so. Today's 15.7.5 is also 'a shipped release'. If one has
any sense one pushes the button and get upgraded, particularly
non-corporates will do that.
And in fact, I suspect that Visual Studio
> actually fixed a bug which is what is causing this new compilation
It's better to first find out if the code should compile in the first place
by referencing it with the (compilation) result of a compiler that might
not have that (possible) bug.
This, to my eye, should not compile as the code appears in a class
> template where difference_type is a nested type of the base class and
> should not be visible unqualified.
This proves my point, iff clang would say it's shite as well, you're
99.999% sure and you know what to do, using VS will, at this moment, not be
conclusive in any way, shape or form (you're stabbing in the dark).
-- *"If something cannot go on forever, it will stop" - Herbert Stein*
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk