Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] clang-win, again
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-13 12:54:48

degski wrote:

> I think in all honesty that the whole concept is wrong, clang/llvm on
> windows should be treated as if it were vc (invoking clang-cl) and not as
> some spin-off of linux-clang, which seems to amount to try getting a
> square peg into a round hole. So, we should not have clang-win, but
> msvc-clang as a target.

That's exactly what clang-win does, it's a msvc-lookalike that uses
clang-cl. But it doesn't work. So we use clang-linux, which kind of works,
except for dynamic_cast.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at