Subject: Re: [boost] clang-win, again
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-13 14:01:21
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 16:53, degski <degski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Now, let's try find out why it doesn't. I was proposing to approach it
> from the other direction, because somehow we seem to have hit a (hitherto)
> unknown stumbling block approaching the problem from this (the linux-clang)
Sorry to make this a split post, but it's an addendum to the prior post.
The problem is obviously not in the is_assignable etc, that's just a matter
of sorting (minor bug(s)) that out, walking the code.
-- *"If something cannot go on forever, it will stop" - Herbert Stein*
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk