Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Trac
From: James E. King III (jking_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-22 11:56:34

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 1:51 PM Michael Caisse via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 8/1/18 05:53, Mateusz Loskot via Boost wrote:
> > On 1 August 2018 at 14:48, John Maddock via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> >>>> OK - looks like we have a pretty strong consensus here - especially
> for
> >>>> Boost. I don't know what has to be done. I presume that the BOD could
> >>>> lean
> >>>> on those who have the power to make this happen. Let's see what they
> can
> >>>> do!
> >>>
> >>> While I agree about Trac, is it really right to declare consensus
> >>> after just two days?
> >>
> >>
> >> To be fair, probably not. On the other hand this issue keeps coming
> round
> >> and nothing ever gets done....
> >
> > Wasn't agreement to migrate to GitHub enough...
> Not really. That was version control and to be historically correct,
> there wasn't "agreement" (o;
> --
> Michael Caisse
> Ciere Consulting
I have a bug to report to Boost.Graph for the proper placement of
"boost/pending" headers.
(I am submitting bugs to all repositories that have headers in

Github issues are disabled for this repository.
Boost Trac has 134 open issues in it for this repository.
There are some potentially serious issues like code regressions ( open for many months without a

I no longer see a way to add new issues to Trac... was the change we
discussed made?
If so, all github repositories must have issues enabled. Right now, I have
no way to file an issue to Boost.Graph.

- Jim

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at