Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] c++03 library survey
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-08-28 16:05:43

On 8/28/18 8:40 AM, degski via Boost wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 at 17:54, Robert Ramey via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>> ... upgrading working code from C++03 to C++11 isn't going
>> to add any benefit, so there it's more attractive to spend one's efforts
>> somewhere else.
> You don't think that move semantics have had a significant impact on C++
> then? Maybe it has not affected BS, and you seem to say there are no
> benefits to be had from move semantics in BS. Is that really really true?
> degski

Actually, I think the the impact of move semantics on performance of
well written existing code is minimal. On new code which uses more
types as values it's helpful.

Of course if the library were written today, it would all the new stuff.
  I don't think it would be faster (unless it were made header only) but
it would likely have have half the number of lines of code (or less).
But the years long slog to address corner cases, workarounds for
compiler bugs and standard library bugs, etc. And there would be design
changes which would also create a bunch of ripple effects. So it would
really end up as a whole re-write.

Robert Ramey

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at