Subject: Re: [boost] [range] #11202: boost.sort header conflicts with boost.range header
From: Steven Ross (spreadsort_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-02 02:21:48
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:22 AM Edward Diener via Boost
> On 8/29/2018 7:53 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> > Neil Groves wrote:
> >> I think that making sort an exception and not bringing it into the
> >> boost namespace is a reasonable short-term fix, that I assume my users
> >> will be less irritated by.
> > That's what I had in mind, yes.
> I think it is a bad idea to make an exception for boost::range::sort
> when all the other range algorithms are directly in boost:: .
It's not pretty, but it sounds reasonable to me. Do you have a counterproposal?
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk