Subject: Re: [boost] [test] unit test command-line handling
From: Olaf Peter (ope-devel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-14 11:35:02
>> ...and what is the appropriate way to signal an error, such as a missing
>> or unsupported command-line argument ? (All the examples in the docs I
>> could find return '0', so another related question is: what is the
>> meaning of the return value ?)
> There is this exception you may throw:
> Again, this is not so well documented here:
I assume throwing setup_error works only with the obsolete init_func?
How would it be with the 'new' way described at the caution note on
bottom of the last URL.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk