Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [cmake] Pull request announcement
From: Mike Dev (mike.dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-17 08:22:49

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost <boost-bounces_at_[hidden]> On Behalf Of Raffi Enficiaud via Boost
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 11:11 AM
> >
> I have a working prototype:
> Please give a try, it is very easy to use and it is still working.

Thanks, I had a quick glance from my mobile, but didn't have the time
to have a proper look. I'll do sometime this week. One early piece of
feedback: I don't see why header-only libraries should be treated
significantly different from normal libraries as far as cmake is

> [...]
> I would be happy to discuss about this offline, with a set of interested
> people.
The issues on your github project seem a good place - or do you want to do this
via email?

> In particular, the design is not intrusive and it lets library
> expose their cmake inside boost or independently.

While non-intrusive design is a good thing for an external add-on, when
you can't modify the original, I think boost should strive for a solution,
where cmake is an integrated & independent part of each individual library.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at