Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Pull request announcement
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-09-27 03:21:21
> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> > Indeed: While the above is a great starting point to support what I
> > want, I don't want to loose the ability for BPL to be built (and tested)
> > as part of the rest of Boost. I would thus prefer something that gives
> > me the ability to choose the build strategy e.g. using some command-line
> > option, including flag to be passed to the build (e.g., `b2 ...
> > standalone=on`), rather than having to modify the (build) code.
> Scanning for Jamroot to identify the project root is fundamental to Jam
> (the Perforce one). We could perhaps add something like
> b2 --jamroot=.
> that would act as if there were an empty Jamroot at . (or equivalently if
> the Jamfile at . were named Jamroot.)
> Apart from that, since the existing installations of Boost aren't modular
> and are installed in the system-global directory /usr, there's not even
> need to enumerate the dependencies accurately or to add an include path.
> You could if you wanted to, I suppose. Python, specifically, only uses
> header-only libraries, so you don't even need to bother with library
The only thing that will not work is this:
import ../../config/checks/config : requires ;