Subject: Re: [boost] [histogram] Variance
From: Hans Dembinski (hans.dembinski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-02 10:47:20
> On 1. Oct 2018, at 15:04, degski <degski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> From what you are saying, and I have no knowledge at all in this matter [just reading what you say], it seems that a policy approach, to allow for both distributions, seems appropriate. Don't want to give you more work, but you just made the [that] point yourself.
No problem, the point of the review is to discover any weaknesses of the design that we will regret later.
Please let's continue the discussion here:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk