Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost CMake support - Request for Comment
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-10 16:02:15

On 10/10/18 1:24 AM, Roger Leigh via Boost wrote:

> I think it's primarily useful for packaging standalone applications
> where there are no complex library dependencies.  Certainly for Windows
> and MacOS X it makes sense.  For packaging a set of libraries like
> Boost, I don't think it's as useful;

> we already have good Boost
> packaging anyway, so I'd suggest ignoring it at least for now.

Hmmm - what is "Boost packaging" refering to?

Robert Ramey

> Regards,
> Roger
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at