Re: [boost] Boost CMake support - Request for Comment

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost CMake support - Request for Comment
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-10 16:02:15

On 10/10/18 1:24 AM, Roger Leigh via Boost wrote:

> I think it's primarily useful for packaging standalone applications 
> where there are no complex library dependencies.  Certainly for Windows 
> and MacOS X it makes sense.  For packaging a set of libraries like 
> Boost, I don't think it's as useful; 

> we already have good Boost 
> packaging anyway, so I'd suggest ignoring it at least for now.

Hmmm - what is "Boost packaging" refering to?

Robert Ramey

> 
> 
> Regards,
> Roger
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>