Subject: Re: [boost] Boost CMake support - Request for Comment
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-10 16:02:15
On 10/10/18 1:24 AM, Roger Leigh via Boost wrote:
> I think it's primarily useful for packaging standalone applications
> where there are no complex library dependencies.Â Certainly for Windows
> and MacOS X it makes sense.Â For packaging a set of libraries like
> Boost, I don't think it's as useful;
> we already have good Boost
> packaging anyway, so I'd suggest ignoring it at least for now.
Hmmm - what is "Boost packaging" refering to?
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk