Re: [boost] "peer reviewed" - Rights and responsibilities of maintainers

Subject: Re: [boost] "peer reviewed" - Rights and responsibilities of maintainers
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-17 16:32:48

Robert Ramey wrote:

> There is also an interesting issue of using float and int as type 
> arguments.  This is never been done before since no user of the 
> serialization library would do this.  It's an interesting new variable in 
> the mix and offhand I don't really know if there are any consequences to 
> this.

In response to these concerns, the author has since reformulated the test so 
that it only uses documented Serialization functionality:

https://github.com/boostorg/serialization/pull/128/files