Re: [boost] "peer reviewed" - Rights and responsibilities of maintainers

Subject: Re: [boost] "peer reviewed" - Rights and responsibilities of maintainers
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-18 07:52:14

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Alexander Grund via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> b) In the case I described and tested with #111 (and now even with #128)
> There are 2 shared libraries with their own instances of the singletons
> (this can be checked by debugging the ctor/dtor of them). The lifetime
> mismatch happens due to "some linux mechanism" destroying same types from
> different libraries at the same time invalidating the expectation of each
> library. Example (actually witnessed by printf-debugging)

Using static libs in shared libs is a recipe for disaster isn't it?
It's undefined behavior..

Does it make sense to try to 'work around' it on specific implementations?

-- 
Olaf