Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-21 20:23:25

On 10/21/18 2:33 PM, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018, 18:51 Robert Ramey via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> <...>
>> Boost has a reason to continue and exist. But Boost is also a committee
>> - albeit a better designed one. It has to evolve as well. I think it can
>> evolve if we continue to work on the stuff we've been successful at
>> while at the same time experimenting with new ideas.
> +1.
> I'm really interested in having all the C++2x prototypes in Boost. Looks
> like everyone would benefit from that. Is that a reasonable idea?

Boost now consists of >150 libraries, a number of them barely
maintained. Who do you propose would maintain those additional projects ?

I think before we can even think of an endeavour of that scale, we
should fix the scalability issues we already have.


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at