Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [histogram] Finalising version for submission
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-22 13:55:28


On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 15:45, Alexander Grund via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I started working on these features and switching to C++14 would simplify the implementation a lot,
> thanks to generic lambdas and return type deduction.
> So I would like to raise the requirement for the final library from C++11 to C++14.
>
> There was currently discussion about "switching to C++11" on the list
> and an often brought argument was "the library maintainer is free to
> raise the requirement at any time" and "there are already Boost.Libs
> requiring C++11/14/17".

Folks,

If this is indeed a generally accepted practice, can we have it documented
on the website, please?

That seems like quite an important guideline, doesn't it.

Best regards,

-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk