Re: [boost] [release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching

Subject: Re: [boost] [release] 1.69.0 deadline for new libraries approaching
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-22 19:54:08

On 10/22/18 12:25 PM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 2018-10-22 03:08 PM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:

> In that sense I think the inclusion of those config files, or at least, 
> any "official support" that may come with it (implied or not), is 
> something that needs to be agreed upon. And *that* would definitely be 
> part of your RFP.

The Draft RFP has received only modest criticism.  Some minor issues 
with wording and reservations about the proposal for anonymity of 
submitters.  I'm highly doubtful that this is due to universal agreement 
that this is path we want go down.  I'm concerned that this is a sign of 
lack of interest.  I don't want to embark upon this unless its pretty 
strong support from the boost community.  If there's isn't sufficient 
support of such an effort now, wwe can always wait another year.

Robert Ramey

> 
> 
> 
> Stefan
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Â Â Â Â Â  ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost