Subject: Re: [boost] The future and present of Boost
From: Michael Caisse (mcaisse-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-23 23:10:31
On 10/22/18 01:14, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
> Another idea: how about dropping the "review manager" requirement? Allow
> library author to manage the review and require a separate manager only if
> the votes for library inclusion are doubtful or there's less than N votes.
The review process is not a democracy vote. The review manager is *the*
decision maker to include or not include a library. The review manager
position is critical to the entire process.
-- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk