Subject: Re: [boost] [histogram] Objections against switch to C++14?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-26 07:36:52
I think it will be fair if we give time until Monday.
If no objections arrive by then, we will assume you the agreement to
go for C++14.
I hope this will work for reviewers as well.
-- Mateusz Loskot Review Manager for the proposed Boost.Histogram On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 18:40, Hans Dembinski <hans.dembinski_at_[hidden]> wrote: > > Dear reviewers of boost.histogram, > > thank you again for your reviews. I am currently working on the issues raised during the review and some of the requested features would be easier to implement when the library standard is raised from C++11 to C++14. This only affects the implementation side, not the user side. It would make my life easier and the implementation code more readable, because I can emulate `if constexpr` using in-place generic lambdas instead of out-of-place functors in the detail namespace. To make the library more user-friendly, I have to do more and more of these emulated `if constexpr`. > > Do you object against raising the requirement from C++11 to C++14 for the implementation of boost.histogram? > > Best regards, > Hans -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk