Re: [boost] Builds from boost/status fail early?

Subject: Re: [boost] Builds from boost/status fail early?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-27 23:21:04

AMDG

On 10/27/2018 04:58 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
> 
>> > (might I suggest aliasing "bt" for "backtrace" in the Boost.Build >
>> debugger?)
>>
>> That's reasonable, but I'd actually like to match gdb's command
>> alias/abbreviations systematically rather than adding individual
>> aliases on an ad-hoc basis.
> 
> `bt` is a gdb abbreviation though. :-)
> 

I know.  All I'm saying is that I also want to add support for:

 "The names where and info stack (abbreviated info s) are
 additional aliases for backtrace."

 "You can abbreviate a GDB command to the first few letters
 of the command name, if that abbreviation is unambiguous"

 r (run), s (step), b (break), etc.

at the same time.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe