Re: [boost] clang-win, (Thin)LTO this time

Subject: Re: [boost] clang-win, (Thin)LTO this time
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-10-31 14:43:45

On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 16:32, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> This shouldn't be necessary with -fuse-ld=lld... but you need to give the
> option in the actual command rather than as a compile flag:
>
> using clang-win : : "C:\\Program Files\\LLVM\\bin\\clang-cl.exe"
> "-fuse-ld=lld" : ... ;
>
> It should then autodetect the above "lld-link.exe /lib" as the archiver.
>
> Or, you could set <archiver> manually:
>
> using clang-win : : : <archiver>"\"C:\\Program
> Files\\LLVM\\bin\\lld-link.exe\" /lib" ... ;
>

 Thank you, I am going to try [all of] that. That bjam-syntax is pretty
mind-boggling. It sounds like the whole thing is already cracked [which is
great!]. Thanks, Peter, thanks again!

degski
-- 
*“If something cannot go on forever, it will stop" - Herbert Stein*