Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-03 02:28:27
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:17 PM Cromwell Enage via Boost <
> The end of section 3.2.1 of the current Boost.Parameter home page tutorial
> notes "that because of the forwarding problem,
> parameter::parameters::operator() can't accept non-const rvalues".
This seems like the kind of feature that could be optional and only turned
on when possible. Why not go that route?
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk