Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?

Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-03 02:28:27

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:17 PM Cromwell Enage via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The end of section 3.2.1 of the current Boost.Parameter home page tutorial
> notes "that because of the forwarding problem,
> parameter::parameters::operator() can't accept non-const rvalues".
>

This seems like the kind of feature that could be optional and only turned
on when possible. Why not go that route?

-- 
-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net