Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-04 08:19:12

Next message: Tim Blechmann: "Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"
Previous message: degski: "Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"
In reply to: Cromwell Enage: "[boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"
Next in thread: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"

> Boost.Heap

boost.heap shouldn't be an issue anymore: it's only using
boost.parameter for template keywords ... i've streamlined the includes
to reflect this ...

cheers,
tim

Next message: Tim Blechmann: "Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"
Previous message: degski: "Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"
In reply to: Cromwell Enage: "[boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"
Next in thread: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] [parameter] Go C++11 and above only, or keep C++03 support?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk