Subject: Re: [boost] Current Guidance on Compiler Warnings?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-19 20:53:25
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:34 PM Marc Glisse via Boost <
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Brian Kuhl via Boost wrote:
> > I'd like to confirm the guidance on Warnings I find here
> > https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/Guidelines/WarningsGuidelines
> > is still considered current?
> > context ...
> > At Wind River we are in the process of working with Boost 1.68 and
> > 7 (with Dinkum 7.00 with and Clang 6.0 for ARM and IA boards and GCC
> > for PowerPC ) with the hope of bundling Boost with our product.
> If you are bundling Boost with your product, can't you mandate the use of
> -isystem to include it, and thus disable most boost warnings at once?
And there is also #pragma system_header, which I use in my Boost libraries,
but people who think that being pedantic about warnings is a good idea
don't like that at all.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk