Re: [boost] Current Guidance on Compiler Warnings?

Subject: Re: [boost] Current Guidance on Compiler Warnings?
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-19 20:53:25

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:34 PM Marc Glisse via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Brian Kuhl via Boost wrote:
>
> > I'd like to confirm the guidance on Warnings I find here
> > https://svn.boost.org/trac10/wiki/Guidelines/WarningsGuidelines
> > is still considered current?
> >
> > context ...
> >
> > At Wind River we are in the process of working with Boost 1.68 and
> VxWorks
> > 7 (with Dinkum 7.00  with and Clang  6.0 for ARM and IA boards and  GCC
> 8.1
> > for PowerPC ) with the hope of bundling Boost with our product.
>
> If you are bundling Boost with your product, can't you mandate the use of
> -isystem to include it, and thus disable most boost warnings at once?
>

+1.

And there is also #pragma system_header, which I use in my Boost libraries,
but people who think that being pedantic about warnings is a good idea
don't like that at all.