|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [threads] Launch deferred for async
From: Gavin Lambert (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-27 03:06:37
On 27/11/2018 02:30, Stephan Menzel wrote:
> But when i get the result:
>
> const bool result = ret.get();
>
> ...the application crashes. Debugging this I came to this in
> boost/thread/future.hpp:9373
>
> } else if (underlying_cast<int>(policy) & int(launch::deferred)) {
> std::terminate();
> //BOOST_THREAD_FUTURE<R> ret;
> //return ::boost::move(ret);
> // return
> boost::detail::make_future_deferred_shared_state<Rp>(
> // BF(
> // thread_detail::decay_copy(boost::forward<F>(f))
> // )
> // );
> } else {
>
> To me this sounds like the application will always std::terminate() when
> launch::deferred is chosen. Why is that?
This implementation appears to be conditioned on
BOOST_THREAD_PROVIDES_VARIADIC_THREAD -- it's implemented "properly"
when that is defined.
In order to get that defined, you must be using at least a C++11
conformant compiler (and compilation mode) and have explicitly defined
the following in all translation units that use Boost.Thread (prior to
including it):
#define BOOST_THREAD_VERSION 4
(or the equivalent project / command line option).
This also makes Boost.Thread behave a more like std::thread, which might
have other consequences if you were relying on the previous behaviour.
I couldn't find any documentation that explains why this was left
unimplemented for the non-variadic version; presumably there was some
kind of compilation issue, or just an assumption that using new
facilities requires using the latest interface version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk