Subject: Re: [boost] Current Guidance on Compiler Warnings?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-27 19:34:46
On 11/27/2018 12:14 PM, Daniela Engert via Boost wrote:
> Am 27.11.2018 um 19:58 schrieb Andrey Semashev via Boost:
> Exactly my position in this regard. If only there were a signed integral
> type with modulo arithmetic in C++. In other words: the raw underlying
> hardware implementation without the UB semantics demanded by C++.
That would be useful if two's complement arithmetic
were really the correct behavior. Since that's rarely
the case, it would only serve to mask the problem.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk