Re: [boost] Current Guidance on Compiler Warnings?

Subject: Re: [boost] Current Guidance on Compiler Warnings?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-27 19:34:46

AMDG

On 11/27/2018 12:14 PM, Daniela Engert via Boost wrote:
> Am 27.11.2018 um 19:58 schrieb Andrey Semashev via Boost:
> 
>> <snip>
> Exactly my position in this regard. If only there were a signed integral
> type with modulo arithmetic in C++. In other words: the raw underlying
> hardware implementation without the UB semantics demanded by C++.
> 

That would be useful if two's complement arithmetic
were really the correct behavior.  Since that's rarely
the case, it would only serve to mask the problem.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe