Subject: Re: [boost] Current Guidance on Compiler Warnings?
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-27 20:45:50
> I would have thought MSVC doesn't do this optimization so it doesn't break existing code
> which assumes int overflow wraps around. Microsoft is usually very careful with this, and for good reasons.
Seems likely. Perhaps we should have a documentation page, "Optimizations Which MSVC Intentionally Avoids".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk