Subject: Re: [boost] Executable files in Boost git repostories
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-04 00:52:04
On 12/03/2018 05:31 PM, Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:
> On 4/12/2018 13:24, Edward Diener wrote:
>> operating system command/batch files are executable files, but should
>> they be so in a repository.
> Files which are not actually executable scripts should not have that bit
> set, of course.
> Files which are executable scripts generally should have the bit set,
> even in the repository.
> However then the question becomes: are these scripts only for the
> maintainer's use (in which case perhaps they shouldn't be in the
Such scripts belong in the repository anyway.
Else what would we do for libraries whose
maintainers' disappear? Or if a library
has multiple maintainers?
> or are they intended for user use (in which case what
> happens on platforms that cannot run the script?)
Just provide multiple scripts?
> So for portability reasons, in my opinion, it's probably better to get
> b2 to do things rather than writing custom scripts that don't work on
> all platforms.
I agree with Stefan. Deciding how to handle these
scripts is the responsibility of each individual
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk