Subject: Re: [boost] Executable files in Boost git repostories
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-04 15:34:31
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:28 AM Edward Diener via Boost <
> On 12/4/2018 8:03 AM, Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:03 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> > boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Yes, I'm in favor of adding some sort of a server-side git hook. For
> >> that all script files need to have an appropriate extension so that they
> >> can be whitelisted to have an executable permission. Though I'm not sure
> >> how server-side git hooks work with GitHub.
> > I don't think there's anything like git server-side hooks.
> https://git-scm.com/docs/githooks and
> https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Hooks suggest
> otherwise, although understanding how to write a hook from the sparse
> documentation seems difficult to me. Maybe someone who has written a git
> hook before understands how we can cycle through the files in a 'git
> push' and, if one of those files is a source file with its executable
> bit set, reject the push.
GitHub doesn't allow those server side hooks.
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk