Subject: Re: [boost] Windows quarantines boost_1_68_0.7z
From: Miguel Ojeda (miguel.ojeda.sandonis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-15 17:00:51
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:54 AM degski <degski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If you have a better explanation, please do put that forward. The fact
> that this particular file get's flagged at all indicates that same
> broken logic.
No, it doesn't. Even if a particular antivirus doesn't support
unpacking of some type of archive, that does not imply they simply
flag it because it is too big.
As AsbjÃ¸rn said, it is likely it analyzes the archive as if it was a
binary blob, searching for some patterns; and given that compression
returns basically random data, there is a chance to hit some false
And yes, I expect antivirus vendors to whitelist "famous" files if
they happen to hit a pattern. :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk