Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)

Subject: Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)
From: stefan (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-17 21:09:40

On 2018-12-17 4:02 p.m., Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:57 PM Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Since it's not possible to grant git push access to the wiki alone,
>> perhaps
>> we should create a separate repository for the new wiki instead of using
>> the
>> superproject one?
>>
>> How does boostorg/wiki sound?
>>
> That sounds fine.. Except for using the wiki functionality in that repo. If
> you are going to create a new repo, might as well make a github pages
> project so get better looking docs.

No, no, no, please no ! :-)

gh-pages are certainly nice, in particular as part of a CI-driven 
pipeline to keep online docs in sync with the code.
But they are no substitute for a wiki, for many different reasons. Let's 
not (again !) make 'perfect' the enemy of 'good'.

Stefan

--
       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...