Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)
From: stefan (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-17 21:09:40

On 2018-12-17 4:02 p.m., Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:57 PM Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>> Since it's not possible to grant git push access to the wiki alone,
>> perhaps
>> we should create a separate repository for the new wiki instead of using
>> the
>> superproject one?
>> How does boostorg/wiki sound?
> That sounds fine.. Except for using the wiki functionality in that repo. If
> you are going to create a new repo, might as well make a github pages
> project so get better looking docs.

No, no, no, please no ! :-)

gh-pages are certainly nice, in particular as part of a CI-driven
pipeline to keep online docs in sync with the code.
But they are no substitute for a wiki, for many different reasons. Let's
not (again !) make 'perfect' the enemy of 'good'.


       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at