Subject: Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)
From: stefan (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-17 21:24:54
On 2018-12-17 4:16 p.m., Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:09 PM stefan via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
>> But they are no substitute for a wiki, for many different reasons.
> Excuse my ignorance.. How so? Which reasons?
* wiki contribution doesn't require the same level of authorization as
write-access to a repo.
* wiki contribution doesn't require any git expertise.
* wiki contribution is much quicker both on the client as well as the
server side (it doesn't require any tools other than a web browser, and
neither a rebuild on the server).
These may sound like quantitative differences, but overall I think they
make a qualitative difference (what people like to call a "game changer").
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk