Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-17 21:30:53

On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 22:28, stefan via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 2018-12-17 4:17 p.m., Mateusz Loskot via Boost wrote:
> > If the old notion of Wiki is not required, I'd stick to git repo
> > with collection of Markdown files and set up a CI build that runs
> > MkDocs and publishes stuff at ``.
> > Then new content could be submitted via PR.
> > I see advantage of having mechanism to review content.
> > - a classic wiki feels like it's too easy to drop any new page with
> > any garbage, scratch notes, etc.
> > A PR-based maintenance would help to avoid that.
> I think there is room (and raison d'etre) for both. A wiki is a
> convenient playground for new content to be "prototyped". Once stable,
> it can be migrated to a more curated model. But shutting down a wiki is
> certainly no way to grow a community (if growing a community is what
> Boost wants - sometimes I'm in serious doubt about that).

A vailid idea.

Why not using boostorg/website straight away
- with Wiki for old Trac Wiki, new ad-hoc and prototyped content
- once golden articles are polished, submitted via PR, they may make
it into the website

Best regards,

Mateusz Loskot,

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at