Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)

Subject: Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-12-18 10:03:12

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of stefan via Boost
> Sent: 17 December 2018 21:34
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Cc: stefan
> Subject: Re: [boost] Boostorg wiki (Was: Re: Ignoring unused type aliases in concepts)
> 
> 
> On 2018-12-17 4:30 p.m., Mateusz Loskot via Boost wrote:
> > Why not using boostorg/website straight away
> > - with Wiki for old Trac Wiki, new ad-hoc and prototyped content
> > - once golden articles are polished, submitted via PR, they may make
> > it into the website
> 
> Sure, that sounds good. It supports both, and allows to streamline the
> integration of both.

OK - sounds good to me too.

So should I continue to convert the TRAC version to Markdown on Github to get agreement on content?

https://github.com/boostorg/boost/wiki/Guidelines:-Warnings

(I will include a reference to the long - if hijacked - recent thread on this topic and try to draw some consensus).

and start a new thread on warning for comments, corrections, condemnations etc.

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal UK LA8 8AB
[phone]